The Dragon's Egg

Seeking knowledge in, of, and about Middle-earth.
Post Reply
User avatar
Elentári
Posts: 5199
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:03 pm
Location: Green Hill Country

The Dragon's Egg

Post by Elentári »

In-depth article on Tolkien's literary genius in comparison to Paolini's Inheritance Cycle in particular, published inThe New Yorker

The Dragon’s Egg: High fantasy for young adults.

by Adam Gopnik
Another British don, Christopher Ricks, once dismissed Tolkien as “our Ossian,” referring to a third-century Irish bard, supposed to be the author of “Fingal” and other Gaelic epics, and wildly popular in the eighteenth century, whose works were actually written by his supposed “translator,” James Macpherson. Dr. Johnson knew it was a fraud, and when asked if any modern man could possibly have written such poetry replied, “Many men, many women, and many children.” Ricks meant the comparison to Ossian as a putdown—that there is something fraudulent and faddish about Tolkien’s ginned-up medievalism.

But the remark helps bring out Tolkien’s real achievement. When you actually read the Ossian epics, you find that they are shaped entirely to neoclassical tastes. The work is heavily Homeric, remote and noble, full of gloomy gray seas and doomy gray mountains, and ribboned with bardlike epithets. “The Lord of the Rings,” by contrast, begins in lovable local detail, birthday parties and fireworks and family squabbles...

...This is surely the most significant of the elements that Tolkien brought to fantasy. It’s true that his fantasies are uniquely “thought through”: every creature has its own origin story, script, or grammar; nothing is gratuitous. But even more compelling was his arranged marriage between the Elder Edda and “The Wind in the Willows”—big Icelandic romance and small-scale, cozy English children’s book. The story told by “The Lord of the Rings” is essentially what would happen if Mole and Ratty got drafted into the Nibelungenlied.
There is magic in long-distance friendships. They let you relate to other human beings in a way that goes beyond being physically together and is often more profound.
~Diana Cortes
User avatar
Frelga
Meanwhile...
Posts: 22487
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:31 pm
Location: Home, where else

Post by Frelga »

Well, given that the author calls Silmarillion and Children of Húrin "dull as dishwater" I kinda question if he is qualified to talk about Tolkien.
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.

Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
User avatar
vison
Best friends forever
Posts: 11961
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:33 pm
Location: Over there.

Post by vison »

I love that! As if Mole and Ratty got drafted into the Nibelungenlied!
Dig deeper.
User avatar
axordil
Pleasantly Twisted
Posts: 8999
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:35 pm
Location: Black Creek Bottoms
Contact:

Post by axordil »

Frelga wrote:Well, given that the author calls Silmarillion and Children of Húrin "dull as dishwater" I kinda question if he is qualified to talk about Tolkien.
Compared to LOTR, they *are* dull. They can be useful, insightful, occasionally moving; nevertheless the First Age material is simply never immediate and engaging the way The Hobbit or LOTR are.

This, from later in the article, tells me the author gets it:
And the truth is that most actual mythologies and epics and sacred books are dull. Nothing is more wearying, for readers whose tastes have been formed by the realist novel, than the Elder Edda. Yet the spell such works cast on their audience wasn’t diminished by what we find tedious. The incantation of names is, on its own, a powerful literary style.
Read more http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/a ... z1fcBaFpBG

ETA--that's interesting--cutting and pasting drops an auto link in. :)
Post Reply