Darwins 200th & US Politics

The place for measured discourse about politics and current events, including developments in science and medicine.
Post Reply
User avatar
sauronsfinger
Posts: 3508
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:25 am

Darwins 200th & US Politics

Post by sauronsfinger »

Today is the 200th birthday of Charles Darwin, a man who changed what we know about the natural history of the world and the creatures who live in it.

The Gallup Poll took a survey back in 2007 to determine how many people believed in evolution. The results demonstrated a rather pronounced divide between Independents and Democrats on one side of the issue and Republicans on the opposite side.

On this day, it seems looking at:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/27847/Majori ... ution.aspx
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers
User avatar
vison
Best friends forever
Posts: 11961
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:33 pm
Location: Over there.

Post by vison »

That is so inexpressibly sad and worrying.

There isn't much anyone can say. There is nothing worse, nothing more dangerous to a person or a society than to refuse to recognize reality.

Darwin was a Giant. He was one of those unique and precious persons the human race occasionally produces and we are never, ever, appreciative enough.
Dig deeper.
User avatar
Primula Baggins
Living in hope
Posts: 40005
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
Contact:

Post by Primula Baggins »

I would guess that opinions about evolution correlate much more strongly with the various branches of religious belief than with politics. Members of more conservative Christin churches are more likely to disbelieve evolution and more likely to be Republicans. Members of liberal churches or no church are more likely to accept evolution and more likely to be Democrats.

Edit: Cross-posted with vison. I have hopes that improvements in American science education are coming. It's important for the economy, after all.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
User avatar
River
bioalchemist
Posts: 13510
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:08 am
Location: the dry land

Post by River »

Primula Baggins wrote: I have hopes that improvements in American science education are coming.
Me too. Science and the people who do it are poorly understood in the public imagination.

To me, evolution isn't up for belief or non-belief. For one thing, the word belief has no place in a discussion of scientific theories. Belief implies you're taking (or not taking) a leap of faith and science doesn't do that. You either accept a theory or you don't. And the thing about evolutionary theory is it's so fundamental to biology you can't do modern biology without accepting it. Trying to understand biology without the theory of evolution is like trying to understand chemistry without the periodic table. You could sort of do it, but you'd make a total hash of it and by denying evolution you've basically cut yourself off from some very important ideas and data. You'd be both deaf and blind.
When you can do nothing what can you do?
User avatar
Hachimitsu
Formerly Wilma
Posts: 942
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:36 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by Hachimitsu »

Thanks for saying that River. It's integral to modern Bio now.
Image
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
At the intersection of here and now
Posts: 47800
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Re: Darwins 200th & US Politics

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

sauronsfinger wrote:The Gallup Poll took a survey back in 2007 to determine how many people believed in evolution. The results demonstrated a rather pronounced divide between Independents and Democrats on one side of the issue and Republicans on the opposite side.

On this day, it seems looking at:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/27847/Majori ... ution.aspx
What's the point of posting this, other than saying "look at stupid Republicans are; most of them don't even believe in evolution? Isn't it possible to have a conversation about the importance of Darwin without turning it into a "let's bash the Republicans" thing?
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Primula Baggins
Living in hope
Posts: 40005
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
Contact:

Post by Primula Baggins »

That's sort of what I was trying to point out.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
User avatar
River
bioalchemist
Posts: 13510
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:08 am
Location: the dry land

Post by River »

I think another contributing factor to this issue (and when you're talking about ~2/3 of the population you're looking at something that transcends party lines) is that for some reason people have drawn a false dichotomy between religion and science. Ie, you can't accept evolution and believe in God. This is fundamentally untrue. I'm not sure where this idea came from. I wish it would go away.
When you can do nothing what can you do?
User avatar
Inanna
Meetu's little sister
Posts: 17885
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:03 pm

Post by Inanna »

Especially since genealogy now proves that we all have a common female ancestor. ONE woman.

Can you believe that? That just rocks my mind.

Oh, connection to River's post is that Christians can argue that that one woman is Eve via evolution.
'You just said "your getting shorter": you've obviously been drinking too much ent-draught and not enough Prim's.' - Jude
User avatar
River
bioalchemist
Posts: 13510
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:08 am
Location: the dry land

Post by River »

Actually, the scientists call her Eve too. The mitochondrial Eve, to be exact. And she has a counterpart, the Y-chromosome Adam.

ETA: I can't help but wonder if the Adam and Eve story is a remnant of an oral history about leaving Africa. That would be a truly ancient memory, but it's a cute idea and I like it. :)
When you can do nothing what can you do?
User avatar
Inanna
Meetu's little sister
Posts: 17885
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:03 pm

Post by Inanna »

Mitochondrial Eve? Y-chromosome Adam?

What cool names!! :D
'You just said "your getting shorter": you've obviously been drinking too much ent-draught and not enough Prim's.' - Jude
User avatar
River
bioalchemist
Posts: 13510
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:08 am
Location: the dry land

Post by River »

Sometimes it's wise to stick with the classics. ;)

ETA: Here's some background. It's quite interesting, really. For one thing, Adam is more recent than Eve (60,000 years ago as opposed to 140,000 years ago). For another, Eve wasn't exactly the mother of all humanity. She was just the one whose mitochondrial lineage survived. Same for Adam.
Mitochondrial Eve
Y-chromosomal Adam
Last edited by River on Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
When you can do nothing what can you do?
User avatar
Primula Baggins
Living in hope
Posts: 40005
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
Contact:

Post by Primula Baggins »

I would be surprised if 2/3 of Americans fervently reject evolution. I think this is probably the product of decades of successful sowing of doubt by evolution opponents. Americans believe in giving the benefit of the doubt to the underdog, and that's exactly the ground the creationists have seized.

One of their many successful wedges, of course, is the idea that it's God OR science. Which is absurd.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
User avatar
River
bioalchemist
Posts: 13510
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:08 am
Location: the dry land

Post by River »

The other part of the problem is scientists have done a poor job of representing ourselves. We let pop culture speak for us and they've been doing it wrong. The NSF has actually started a program to get more accurate representations of science and scientists into the media. If it takes off expect to see messier and more cluttered labs on screen in the near future and more heads banging against the wall and hints of a greater time lag between starting an experiment and getting results. ;) Actually, that documentary about Antarctica that came out last year (blanking on the name, was directed by the same guy who did Grizzly Man) was funded by that program. The director set out to show what kinds of people end up working in Antarctica and he did a pretty good job of showing scientists at work and play. One of my favorite bits was when a couple collaborators got cool results and accepted them with cautious reserve. From my insider's perspective, this was a completely normal response to cool results, especially for old and tenured professors like the guys in the film, but the director, who as narrarating, seemed stunned that they weren't leaping about shouting "Eureka!" :rofl:
When you can do nothing what can you do?
User avatar
BrianIsSmilingAtYou
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:01 am
Location: Philadelphia

Post by BrianIsSmilingAtYou »

River wrote:Actually, the scientists call her Eve too. The mitochondrial Eve, to be exact. And she has a counterpart, the Y-chromosome Adam.

ETA: I can't help but wonder if the Adam and Eve story is a remnant of an oral history about leaving Africa. That would be a truly ancient memory, but it's a cute idea and I like it. :)
The Adam and Eve story is generally believed to go back to the Iraq marshes at the convergence of the Tigris and Euphrates. The life there was once a simple one. The emergence (and desire) of technology would likely be seen as incompatible with such a simple life, thus knowledge would be perceived as disruptive to the idyllic nature of such an existence.

This is consistent with many of the other early references in Genesis, such as Abraham coming from Ur, the probable location of the Tower of Babel etc.

Older speculation placed it in Abyssinia (modern Ethiopia), but my understanding is that this interpretation is generally discounted except by biblically oriented Ethiopians.

BrianIs :) AtYou
Image

All of my nieces and nephews at my godson/nephew Nicholas's Medical School graduation. Now a neurosurgical resident at University of Arizona, Tucson.
User avatar
vison
Best friends forever
Posts: 11961
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:33 pm
Location: Over there.

Re: Darwins 200th & US Politics

Post by vison »

Voronwë_the_Faithful wrote:
sauronsfinger wrote:The Gallup Poll took a survey back in 2007 to determine how many people believed in evolution. The results demonstrated a rather pronounced divide between Independents and Democrats on one side of the issue and Republicans on the opposite side.

On this day, it seems looking at:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/27847/Majori ... ution.aspx
What's the point of posting this, other than saying "look at stupid Republicans are; most of them don't even believe in evolution? Isn't it possible to have a conversation about the importance of Darwin without turning it into a "let's bash the Republicans" thing?
The name of the thread is "Darwins 200th and US Politics".
Dig deeper.
User avatar
vison
Best friends forever
Posts: 11961
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:33 pm
Location: Over there.

Post by vison »

Time magazine had a picture of that Eve on their cover some years ago. It was one of the coolest things I ever saw - and I recall the tone of many of the letters to the editor in the next edition from readers who didn't quite think it was "cool".

I do think one of the biggest problems, aside from the "you can't believe in God if you believe in Evolution", is that Darwin's theory is so dreadfully badly taught. I have adult friends who wriggle with discomfort, and deny they could be descended "from the monkeys".
Dig deeper.
User avatar
yovargas
I miss Prim ...
Posts: 15011
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:13 am
Location: Florida

Post by yovargas »

vison wrote:I do think one of the biggest problems, aside from the "you can't believe in God if you believe in Evolution"...
More accurately, it's "you can't believe in the Bible as literal truth if you believe in Evolution". Which is pretty much true.
User avatar
Dave_LF
Wrong within normal parameters
Posts: 7039
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am

Post by Dave_LF »

vison wrote:There isn't much anyone can say. There is nothing worse, nothing more dangerous to a person or a society than to refuse to recognize reality.
And evolution denial isn't the only or the least offense in that arena. Funny how that works. In my opinion, it is a direct result of the cart-before-the-horse approach to knowledge that starts with belief and works it's way down to facts. Get in the habit of doing this and you lose the ability to work in the other direction. Before you know it, half the people in your country live in an alternate reality.
User avatar
Frelga
Meanwhile...
Posts: 23335
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:31 pm
Location: Home, where else

Re: Darwins 200th & US Politics

Post by Frelga »

Voronwë_the_Faithful wrote:What's the point of posting this, other than saying "look at stupid Republicans are; most of them don't even believe in evolution? Isn't it possible to have a conversation about the importance of Darwin without turning it into a "let's bash the Republicans" thing?
First off, notice how no one else actually said "stupid Republicans"?

Second, the statistic, if true, is in fact telling, not so much in terms of anyone's intelligence or lack thereoff, but in understanding the demographics and ideological forces that support one of two major political parties.

As quite a few posters here prove, science is perfectly compatible with religion. It is however entirely incompatible with blind faith. It's the opposite of it, being founded on constant questioning of EVERYTHING.
"What a place! What a situation! What kind of man would put a known criminal in charge of a major branch of government? Apart from, say, the average voter."

Terry Pratchett, Going Postal
Post Reply