
It's our only chance to read the books through new eyes again.
Indeed, and no Tolkien-related message board is complete until the subject of Tom Bombadil has been discussed. (Now where's that Balrog with/without wings thread?There can never be enough Bombadil!
I believe that Wildwood’s approach to Tom—I don’t think Tom needs philosophizing about, and is not improved by it.
—is precisely the approach Tolkien meant us to take. Our example for this is, I believe, the hobbits Frodo, Sam, Merry, and Pippin:Wildwood wrote:Tom and Goldberry are one of those things that I probably don't *want* explained to me, too much! The mystery, the fantasy, the fancy surrounding them is part of their magic and charm for me.
Frodo and Sam as if enchanted...
The hobbits sat still before him, enchanted...
Whether the morning and evening of one day or many days had passed Frodo could not tell…He spoke at last out of his wonder…
Then Tom and Goldberry set the table; and the hobbits sat half in wonder and half in laughter; so fair was the grace of Goldberry and so merry and odd the caperings of Tom.
'What do you mean?' asked Pippin, looking at him, half puzzled and half amused.
Sam summarizes their feelings when he says after Tom has set them off on the path to Bree:Tom sang most of the time, but it was chiefly nonsense, or else perhaps a strange language unknown to the hobbits, an ancient language whose words were mainly those of wonder and delight.
The hobbits themselves explored the mystery of Tom’s identity. Frodo asks Goldberry who Tom is. What’s her answer?‘He’s a caution and no mistake. I reckon we may go a good deal further and see naught better, nor queerer.’
Not satisfied with Goldberry's response, Frodo asks Tom himself. Tom replies:’He is, as you have seen him…He is the Master of wood, water, and hill…He has no fear. Tom Bombadil is the master.’
Bombadil's precise identity is supposed to be mystery (Letter 144):‘Eh what?...Don’t you know my name yet? That’s the only answer…Eldest, that’s what I am…’
The character of Tom Bombadil has many detractors. Some find him silly, or even annoying. Some believe that Tolkien inserted Bombadil into the story at a point where he had no clear idea of where it was going, and left Tom in the story merely because he had no desire to remove what he’d already written despite its seeming incongruence with the remainder of the story. Those who hold this opinion apparently do not believe Tolkien when he wrote (Letter 144):And even in a mythical Age there must be some enigmas, as there always are. Tom Bombadil is one (intentionally).
It would seem that regardless of the circumstances that led Tolkien to inserting Bombadil in LOTR—and leaving him in LOTR despite those who apparently attempted to persuade Tolkien to remove him—Tom was meant to be included and does serve a purpose in Tolkien's story. Whether or not that purpose is perceived by every reader, however, is another question.Tom Bombadil is not an important person—to the narrative…he represents something that I feel important, though I would not be prepared to analyze the feeling precisely I would not, however, have left him in, if he did not have some kind of function…
It seems that Goldberry knew what she was talking about after all: Tom is Master.He is master in a peculiar way: he has no fear, and no desire of possession or domination at all. He merely knows and understands about such things as concern him in his natural little realm. He hardly even judges, and as far as can be seen makes no effort to reform or remove even the Willow.
Yes, exactly. A splinter of Eru. He embodies the natural world because there is no "I" between him and the natural world. He is "one with the natural world" because his spirit is not separate from his material body.And there is this: if Tom is the song, or a part of the song, or the echo of the song, then Tom existed before Arda as well as being a very part of the fabrid of Arda. Tom embodies the natural world, but he also is ageless, without beginning or end. What a curious idea that is! A splinter of Eru, in fact.
So there we have it. If Bombadil was a pure material "splinter of Eru" as Imp put it, then Gandalf the White came back from death as a pure spiritual "splinter of Eru".He was sent by a mere prudent plan of the angelic Valar or governors; but Authority had taken up this plan and enlarged it, at the moment of its failure. 'Naked I was sent back -- for a brief time, until my task is done'. Sent back by whom, and whence? Not by the 'gods' whose business is only with this embodied world and its time; for he pased 'out of thought and time'.
And now, for those of you who, like me, can never get enough Bombadil. I now present Old Tom...in German!There can never be enough Bombadil!
Tom Bombadil wears Lederhosen!Hose ganz aus Leder
Finally Tom Bombadil himself was from his first conception a genius loci, a ‘spirit of the place’, the place being, as Tolkien remarked to Unwin (see Letters, p.26), ‘the (vanishing) Oxfordshire and Berkshire countryside’. The elves in The Lord of the Rings call him ‘oldest and fatherless’; he is the one creature whom the Ring has no power at all, not even to make invisible; but he could not defy Sauron permanently, for his power ‘is in the earth itself’, and Sauron ‘can torture and destroy the very hills’. He is a kind of exhalation of the earth, a nature-spirit and once again a highly English one: cheerful, noisy, unpretentious to the point of shabbiness, extremely direct, apparently rather simple, not as simple as he looks. The fact that everything he says is in a sort of verse, whether printed as verse or not, and that the hobbits too find themselves ‘singing merrily, as if it was easier and more natural than talking’, make him seem, not an artist, but someone from an age before art and nature were distinguished, when magic needed no wizard’s staff but came from words alone. Tolkien may have got the idea from the singing wizards of the Finnish epic the Kalevala, which he so much admired, and which he perhaps wished might also have an English counterpart.
Tom can be the echo of the Music that was and the vessel for the music that is still to be played out, the song of Eru that remains to be sung unto the very ending of the world, the echo of it which remains in the fabric of Arda - in the soil, in the grass, the air and sky but mostly in the water. He is Master... of the music. The keeper, the carer, the stone which has gathered the moss of all the melodies and harmonies of the Ainulindalë.
I, too, am grieved when others treat Tom as if he were some goofy fluff that Tolkien tacked onto LOTR on a whim. I believe if people were to read the Bombadil chapters with an open mind they'd see that Tom is far more profound a character than he seems on the surface.Impenitent wrote:It has always confused (and somewhat saddened) me when others don't find any depth in Tom, when he's been reduced to an annoyance babbling bad poetry. I have wondered whether it is all my inference and none of Tolkien's intent.