Gun Control Debate
Re: Gun Control Debate
I think that analysis ignores the strong influence of libertarian-style philosophy on US politics. Though why that influence seems to have so little influence anywhere else is another question.
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
Re: Gun Control Debate
I read it on real paper, not on website. I’ll have to look up if there is an online version. But tonight I’ll go to the theatre to watch a piece about the centenary of the Russian Revolution!
"nolite te bastardes carborundorum".
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
Re: Gun Control Debate
yov, I think the libertarian viewpoint is, like any other viewpoint in this country, influential only when what it urges facilitates something the powerful want to have happen (e.g., selling more guns in the United States than there are people to carry them).
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
Re: Gun Control Debate
Yov, what do you see as libertarian influence?yovargas wrote:I think that analysis ignores the strong influence of libertarian-style philosophy on US politics. Though why that influence seems to have so little influence anywhere else is another question.
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Re: Gun Control Debate
The general idea that gov't should have very limited, specific powers and outside of that, should not be involved in people's lives.
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
Re: Gun Control Debate
If you search for the previously mentioned German sentence "Gibt es einen sozialen Todestrieb?" you will find that the sentence refers to a November interview in the German newspaper of record Die Zeit. The article can only be read if you have acquired a subscription to Zeit Online http://www.zeit.de/2017/46/amoklaeufe-u ... ettansicht
The interview is with Joseph Vogl, a German philosopher and what the Germans call Literaturwissenschaftler ("literature scientist", so in essence a humanities scholar who specializes in literature). Vogl rose to minor fame in several leading German newspapers in 2010/11, when he released his book Das Gespenst des Kapitals (in English "The Specter of Capital", a title that obviously refers to the prominent first sentence of a quintessential book), in which he discusses the theological roots of modern economics as a science (from the seventeenth to the late twentieth centuries). In his book, Vogl coins and prominently uses the term Oikodizee, a term which he modeled after theodicy, to refer to what he identifies as a widespread belief in a self-regulated, rational market. The book contains some interesting passages but overall it is badly written, sometimes revealing the author's lack of knowledge in the field of economics and its history as a science, and more importantly thoroughly unoriginal (much more profound Marxists of all stripes have pointed out the theological roots of classical economics since the nineteenth century).
The interview with Vogl in Die Zeit is less about US gun culture but about the connection between lone mass murderers and "late-capitalism", a term used by some prominent post-war Marxists to refer to the current stage of Western capitalism (Vogl has published German translations of French philosophers Lyotard and Deleuze and thereby must be viewed in the light of a continental (West-)European post-structural intellectual milieu).
The phrase "sozialer Todestrieb" in the title is better translated as "social death-drive" and reveals the influence of Freudian psychoanalysis on the field. In the interview, Vogl tries to connect the two presidents Reagan and Trump, a point which is first raised by the interviewer himself who locates Trump in the tradition line of Reagonomics. And as laid-off postal employees "went postal" in the 1980s, so now does the former postal clerk Stephen Paddock go on a shooting spree. There is one good phrase in the interview which refers to modern US suburbs as "Amazon ghettos". Vogl also cites Tony Judt, a much more interesting intellectual figure who passed away in 2010, and name-drops Adorno (who is a tough but very illuminating read).
In the last third of the interview, Vogl speaks about society-wide suicidal tendencies in America that aim to decrease the life-span of others, and sometimes even of one self, citing the fights over Obamacare and gun rights as examples. All of that reads very much like one of those typical Feuilleton articles which feature a (conservative, liberal, or Marxist) public intellectual who has declared his competence over a wide range of academic fields and now must educate the bourgeois masses.
What Vogl does not mention in the interview (unless it was cut from the online version) is the role of religious belief in the United States in all of this. To inherently link high religiosity in a society with "pre-modern conceptions of the value of modern[?] life" would be extremely uninformed and reveal Vogl as an adherent of late nineteenth-century conceptions about modernity, that ever fickle term.
PS: Corrected a typo.
The interview is with Joseph Vogl, a German philosopher and what the Germans call Literaturwissenschaftler ("literature scientist", so in essence a humanities scholar who specializes in literature). Vogl rose to minor fame in several leading German newspapers in 2010/11, when he released his book Das Gespenst des Kapitals (in English "The Specter of Capital", a title that obviously refers to the prominent first sentence of a quintessential book), in which he discusses the theological roots of modern economics as a science (from the seventeenth to the late twentieth centuries). In his book, Vogl coins and prominently uses the term Oikodizee, a term which he modeled after theodicy, to refer to what he identifies as a widespread belief in a self-regulated, rational market. The book contains some interesting passages but overall it is badly written, sometimes revealing the author's lack of knowledge in the field of economics and its history as a science, and more importantly thoroughly unoriginal (much more profound Marxists of all stripes have pointed out the theological roots of classical economics since the nineteenth century).
The interview with Vogl in Die Zeit is less about US gun culture but about the connection between lone mass murderers and "late-capitalism", a term used by some prominent post-war Marxists to refer to the current stage of Western capitalism (Vogl has published German translations of French philosophers Lyotard and Deleuze and thereby must be viewed in the light of a continental (West-)European post-structural intellectual milieu).
The phrase "sozialer Todestrieb" in the title is better translated as "social death-drive" and reveals the influence of Freudian psychoanalysis on the field. In the interview, Vogl tries to connect the two presidents Reagan and Trump, a point which is first raised by the interviewer himself who locates Trump in the tradition line of Reagonomics. And as laid-off postal employees "went postal" in the 1980s, so now does the former postal clerk Stephen Paddock go on a shooting spree. There is one good phrase in the interview which refers to modern US suburbs as "Amazon ghettos". Vogl also cites Tony Judt, a much more interesting intellectual figure who passed away in 2010, and name-drops Adorno (who is a tough but very illuminating read).
In the last third of the interview, Vogl speaks about society-wide suicidal tendencies in America that aim to decrease the life-span of others, and sometimes even of one self, citing the fights over Obamacare and gun rights as examples. All of that reads very much like one of those typical Feuilleton articles which feature a (conservative, liberal, or Marxist) public intellectual who has declared his competence over a wide range of academic fields and now must educate the bourgeois masses.
What Vogl does not mention in the interview (unless it was cut from the online version) is the role of religious belief in the United States in all of this. To inherently link high religiosity in a society with "pre-modern conceptions of the value of modern[?] life" would be extremely uninformed and reveal Vogl as an adherent of late nineteenth-century conceptions about modernity, that ever fickle term.
PS: Corrected a typo.
Last edited by Beutlin on Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- RoseMorninStar
- Posts: 13117
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:07 am
- Location: North Shire
Re: Gun Control Debate
Sounds like an interesting article Nin. I have long found the God/Guns connection an unfathomable paradox.
My heart is forever in the Shire.
Re: Gun Control Debate
While the idea of a limited government is nowadays mostly or primarily associated with libertarianism, I would not equate the two. If one follows the Wikipedia definition of libertarianism ("a collection of political philosophies and movements that uphold liberty as a core principle."), one could apply this label to most present American political movements (even some parts of the online alt-right), and to a lesser degree even to a large chunk of European parties.yovargas wrote:The general idea that gov't should have very limited, specific powers and outside of that, should not be involved in people's lives.
While it is dangerous to overgeneralize these differences, there exists indeed a larger degree of state power skepticism in the current Anglo-Saxon world as opposed to continental Europe. The reasons for these differences must primarily be traced to the relatively recent past (~150) years, but wide-spread American bourgeois skepticism to state authority go back at least to the Revolution. Most of the defining figures of the revolution held, among other things, strong liberal convictions. Their liberalism was much different from current American liberalism and central aspects of their liberal views would confuse and even shock 21st-century liberals and conservatives (and I am specifically not alluding here to race- and gender-related issues). To cut a long story short: I would say that 18century liberal ideas very much shaped the America of today, including wide-spread state skepticism, and yes, this also relates to guns.
Re: Gun Control Debate
Libertarian philosophy defines the "core principle" of "liberty" in a much more clear, specific way than the average person does. Using that more specific sense, I don't agree that it applies to many American political movements.Beutlin wrote:While the idea of a limited government is nowadays mostly or primarily associated with libertarianism, I would not equate the two. If one follows the Wikipedia definition of libertarianism ("a collection of political philosophies and movements that uphold liberty as a core principle."), one could apply this label to most present American political movements (even some parts of the online alt-right), and to a lesser degree even to a large chunk of European parties.yovargas wrote:The general idea that gov't should have very limited, specific powers and outside of that, should not be involved in people's lives.
But we're Osgilliating a bit if we go further down that road.
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
Re: Gun Control Debate
Oh, I am primarily referring here to the historical roots of said American views that government should have very limited powers, which are not so much rooted in libertarianism (a movement which from a conceptual perspective really only begins to take form after WWII) but eighteenth-century liberalism. Current libertarian philosophy is in many ways a very late child of this old liberalism (and several other ideological parents) but it is not its direct and only successor. This also partly explains why tens of millions of Americans hold superficially-identified-as libertarian ideals (mistrust of federal institutions, a strong valuation of gun and property rights, a push for lower taxes, etc.) but the utter lack of mass support for the Libertarian Party.
PS: To osgiliate the osgiliating: I think the term could soon be replaced with something from the TV series: eorlinging, arthedaining, etc.
PS: To osgiliate the osgiliating: I think the term could soon be replaced with something from the TV series: eorlinging, arthedaining, etc.
Re: Gun Control Debate
Found this on facebook today, seems appropriate to share it here and now:
- Attachments
-
- govt.jpg (86.16 KiB) Viewed 7478 times
Re: Gun Control Debate
And then the same guy turns around and says, "But why didn't the government...."
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- Cenedril_Gildinaur
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:01 pm
Re: Gun Control Debate
I don't see that as a popular view in the US.yovargas wrote:The general idea that gov't should have very limited, specific powers and outside of that, should not be involved in people's lives.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."
-- Samuel Adams
-- Samuel Adams
Re: Gun Control Debate
Tweeted by a Deseret News Reporter.
https://twitter.com/kelsey_dallas/statu ... 0299527168 via JK Rowling
https://twitter.com/kelsey_dallas/statu ... 0299527168 via JK Rowling
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- Dave_LF
- Wrong within normal parameters
- Posts: 6841
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: The other side of Michigan
Re: Gun Control Debate
So is that supposed to be an argument for or against guns? So confused...
- RoseMorninStar
- Posts: 13117
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:07 am
- Location: North Shire
Re: Gun Control Debate
I don't think Jesus would have carried or used a gun, nor would he have advocated for them. I find this kind of stuff misguided to the point of willful, twisted corruption of Christianity.
In response to your question, Dave, it would be quite the miracle if a gun would allow one to be physically alive for 2,000 years. I suppose they are thinking that bodily life is more important than their immortal soul?
In response to your question, Dave, it would be quite the miracle if a gun would allow one to be physically alive for 2,000 years. I suppose they are thinking that bodily life is more important than their immortal soul?
My heart is forever in the Shire.
Re: Gun Control Debate
I genuinely don't understand if that bumper sticker is meant seriously or if it is trying to be some sort of weird, ironic joke. Very, very strange.
I wanna love somebody but I don't know how
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
I wanna throw my body in the river and drown
-The Decemberists
- RoseMorninStar
- Posts: 13117
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:07 am
- Location: North Shire
Re: Gun Control Debate
It's a joke I think aimed at the overlap between evangelical Christians and gun rights advocates.
- Túrin Turambar
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 9:37 am
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Re: Gun Control Debate
I took it as a joke as well.