O/T: I don't see anything near to offensive in Lidless post either. Since when is it offensive to talk about customs and beliefs of other parts of the world? Or is it in the sense that anything different from our world would be less than what we think, so it should not mentionned? But then I would rather find that vision of the world offensive.
Anyway back on the topic and to some of the questions rised.
Pearly Di, the question about praying is very serious. How often also in the prayer threads you see people asking ot pray for the success of a certain enterprise or how often have people have prayed for victories in war? I habe gone through situations when loved ones were on the edge of death or when my new-born son's life ws in danger - and could not pray. It did not bring any comfort to me, on the contrary. (the same for mourning, by the way)
Do I think that people who pray don't think that they are responsible for their actions? Well, in some cases I wonder - like the religious parents about whom the article spoke to which Prim linked the other day in another thread. How can they not treat their child and wait for a healing by prayer? They put the power of action they have away from themselves and I see that as putting responsibility away. Maybe this is only true for fanatics, but the whole process of praying is so alien to me that I really wonder.
What I can understand - but maybe this is totally wrong: when life is hard, talking to a friend helps. So if you have a relationship with God, does it help simply to talk to him - like to a friend?
Oh, and what Di said about the world without her deity being bleak: I feel the same if I think my world with a God. It does not feel right to put a wrong base on the world, like a house with wrong fundations. It's an idea which makes me shudder. But this is only
my world.
Axordil....
I have come to believe the opposite: some of us are born with a natural neurological proclivity for faith, and others with a natural neurological proclivity against it. One may of course choose to move contrary to either natural proclivity for a variety of reasons, which explains the broad variety of religious experiences.
I'm not sure if this makes any difference, really. I do wonder what James would have made of neurological psychology.
But does that simply place neurobiology in the place of God? So, some get the revelation and are "the chosen" people if it is by biology or by words... I don't believe in such a power of genetic predisposition.
"nolite te bastardes carborundorum".