
(And you know it will be, but it's just so hard sometimes.)
I was going to talk about the multimedia thing a bit. I find it very interesting that so many of you would be opposed to that kind of thing. It's what's considered modern here; if your church still uses hymnals, then your church is considered behind the times, at least in evangelical church circles.
Personally, I could go either way. At first, I was opposed to the big screens, because, as a musician, I like to read music when I'm singing. I can see the harmony that way and see what's coming up, etc. But then I could see the advantages of not having people's faces buried in their hymnals. Forcing people to look up, helps with the energy level.
Granted, you want a worship leader to take the time to make sure the congregation learns a new song.
I don't think either is better than the other, just different. One thing I always want to keep in mind is that question: How would I feel if I were a visitor here? I would want to know what's coming up, if there are to be any responses made or anything like that. I appreciate it in a liturgical church when it's very clearly laid out for me that I'm supposed to say, "Thanks be to God" after the reading of the Scripture and things like that. I wouldn't know otherwise.
So if you use screens, then you need to have a good person up there, keeping pace well, timing it just right so that you move onto the next set of lyrics before they arrive musically but not so soon that you forget what you're supposed to be singing right now. It takes some skill.
If we read Scripture aloud (about the only thing we do like that), then it needs to be up on the screens, and the same thing applies as for lyrics.
The sermon points are on the screen. Informational slides are on the screen. Announcements are on the screen. Videos are on the screen.
It's what I'm seeing in evangelical churches now. :shrug: (You all really do need to import that smilie.

But it's interesting to read the thoughts here on it.
Lali