I thought Mrs. Obama's black dress, with the black surrounding all that red, was pretty symbolic. Probably on purpose. She's lovely and designers are going to want to dress her, the way they did Jackie Kennedy.
Good work, you guys.

I am in awe though that I watched history being made tonight and it will be something I remember and before retiring, I will record it in my journal."It was the best of times, it was the worst of times; it ws the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness; it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity; it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness; it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair; we had everything before us, we had nothing before us; we were all going directly to Heaven, we were all going the other way."
That struck me too, beginning with the debates. He is a thoughtful man, whose education had given him the breadth and the depth to see the connections between events. He has shown that he can stay cool under enormous pressure, civil in the face of enmity, and at least appear humble in the face of decisive victory. He has shown, too, that he can bring people together, and inspire them, not to hate a common enemy, not to deride a boogie man, but to act on their best dreams for common good.Dave_LF wrote:I'm again struck by the thing that caught my attention in the first place; the sheer sense of context the man has.
To be a wet blanket, 350-odd electoral votes and a 52-47 split in the popular vote is hardly a landlside. It's a comfortable win, and more decisive than Bush's two narrow ones, but about average as far as modern elections go. If anything, it's significantly closer than I and the polls expected - most of the battleground states went to Obama by less than one percent of the vote.Primula Baggins wrote:I wanted him to win, but to have it be a landslide is extra sweet.
It's a high threshold (only four Presidents have won elections with 60% or more). I think the margin matters more than the winner's overall vote, though. For example, in 1980 and 2004 the winning candidates won 50.7% of the vote. Reagan won close to 10% more of the vote than Carter, however (due to third party candidate John Anderson) while Bush won less than 2.5% more than Kerry. As such, Reagan won the Electoral Vote 489-49 while Bush only won it 286-251. Any reasonable observer would probably call Reagan's 44-state win a landslide.Holbytla wrote:I was of the belief 60% constituted a landslide. Which Nixon was the last to achieve. Reagan was close.