What did PJ do Perfectly?
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
I agree, Wampus. Boromir worked better in the film than in the book, partly because he necessarily had to be a real presence when he was on screen; he couldn't be "mentioned in passing" as he was in the text.
I don't think PJ improved on Tolkien, though; I think he conveyed what was already there in the story, though told with little emphasis or drama, or even reconstructed later by other characters (Boromir's death). And quite possibly in the book at that point, that was exactly the right choice; Boromir's death playing out in full might have overshadowed Frodo's departure, which was hugely more important. The film had other tools to keep the emphasis where it belonged.
I don't think PJ improved on Tolkien, though; I think he conveyed what was already there in the story, though told with little emphasis or drama, or even reconstructed later by other characters (Boromir's death). And quite possibly in the book at that point, that was exactly the right choice; Boromir's death playing out in full might have overshadowed Frodo's departure, which was hugely more important. The film had other tools to keep the emphasis where it belonged.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- Impenitent
- Throw me a rope.
- Posts: 7267
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:13 am
- Location: Deep in Oz
The set design.
The great plain of Gorgoroth.
The Shire.
The first glimpse of Strider.
The Short Cut to Mushrooms segue into the Black Rider.
"Where is the horse and the rider" - beautiful!
Moria.
Gollum.
Rivendell, and the Library, and the valley, and the bridge and...well, the whole of Rivendell.
Mountains!
The ripping down of the trees of Isengard (made me cry! "The trees are strong, lord" "Rip them all down!")
The gates of the Argonath...the rush of the river, the grandeur of the ancient carvings and, mostly, Aragorn's face.
And, while I'm at it, Aragorn. And Boromir (except for the "My King" speech), and Gandalf. And the hobbits - all of them.
Moria and the drums in the deep.
Geez. Sounds like I loved it all, doesn't it? I didn't, though. Faramir. Denethor the crazy cruel boorish tyrant. Osgiliath!! Arrrgh!!
(And I'm sorry...I must say it...Frodo's smile at the Havens was the cheesiest thing I ever saw...it lasted too long and made him look like an imbecile IMO. I know...I'm a barbarian.)
I'll reactivate my "nice" switch, now.
The great plain of Gorgoroth.
The Shire.
The first glimpse of Strider.
The Short Cut to Mushrooms segue into the Black Rider.
"Where is the horse and the rider" - beautiful!
Moria.
Gollum.
Rivendell, and the Library, and the valley, and the bridge and...well, the whole of Rivendell.
Mountains!
The ripping down of the trees of Isengard (made me cry! "The trees are strong, lord" "Rip them all down!")
The gates of the Argonath...the rush of the river, the grandeur of the ancient carvings and, mostly, Aragorn's face.
And, while I'm at it, Aragorn. And Boromir (except for the "My King" speech), and Gandalf. And the hobbits - all of them.
Moria and the drums in the deep.
Geez. Sounds like I loved it all, doesn't it? I didn't, though. Faramir. Denethor the crazy cruel boorish tyrant. Osgiliath!! Arrrgh!!
(And I'm sorry...I must say it...Frodo's smile at the Havens was the cheesiest thing I ever saw...it lasted too long and made him look like an imbecile IMO. I know...I'm a barbarian.)
I'll reactivate my "nice" switch, now.
Mornings wouldn't suck so badly if they came later in the day.
- Impenitent
- Throw me a rope.
- Posts: 7267
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 12:13 am
- Location: Deep in Oz
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
Impy, what good is a messageboard where people won't express their opinions freely? I ask you.
I think after all these years we can have differing opinions about PJ's movies without coming to blows. Why, I hardly ever hit vison any more, no matter how mean she gets.
I think after all these years we can have differing opinions about PJ's movies without coming to blows. Why, I hardly ever hit vison any more, no matter how mean she gets.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
Strong disagreement, civilly expressed, makes for a much more interesting board for everyone.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
Count Rushdie into the Jackson worshipper clan.
From Rushdie speech on book adaptation. No link, they are a pain on Treo, and Google works.“I would suggest that Peter Jackson’s films were better than Tolkien’s books,” Rushdie said of the “Lord of the Rings” series. “Jackson directs better than Tolkien writes.”
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- sauronsfinger
- Posts: 3508
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:25 am
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers
Some Harry Potter fans keep on telling me how more they enjoyed Peter Jackson's films than Tolkien's book. Peasants.
They found LotR 'boring' and it was a struggle for them to get through it, as compared with the Bestest Fantasy Series Evah.
And I'm, like:
Rowling better than Tolkien? Yeah, right. She has more deux ex machina in her secondary world than Landroval and his feathery mates could shake a stick at.
Actually, I often defend her from her detractors. I like HP!
But she ain't better than the Granddaddy.
They found LotR 'boring' and it was a struggle for them to get through it, as compared with the Bestest Fantasy Series Evah.
And I'm, like:
Rowling better than Tolkien? Yeah, right. She has more deux ex machina in her secondary world than Landroval and his feathery mates could shake a stick at.
Actually, I often defend her from her detractors. I like HP!
But she ain't better than the Granddaddy.
"Frodo undertook his quest out of love - to save the world he knew from disaster at his own expense, if he could ... "
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
- Dave_LF
- Wrong within normal parameters
- Posts: 6853
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: The other side of Michigan
Tolkien was more interested in exposition and creation than entertainment. His novels are certainly entertaining at times, but his rhythm and narrative style are not geared toward keeping the reader on the edge of his seat wondering what will happen next, and he often introduces characters and events that are designed to serve the setting rather than the plot. Most people can't conceive of any purpose for stories other than entertainment, which I think explains the disconnect that often occurs. It also explains some of the changes made for the films; if people expect entertainment in novels, they really expect it in movies.
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
They're such different media, and people have different sensibilities. Some things can be told almost instantly in a book that take several minutes in a film ("He grew up working hard on his father's farm"); some things a film can establish almost instantly, such as a character's appearance or a setting, that might take several pages in a book. The tools being so different means the result of an adaptation just can't be the same as the source, and those differences may seem like improvements to one person and desecrations to another.
Over the years, discussing LotR book and film from all these different perspectives has taught me a lot about both. I've been in online discussions where everyone agrees, and it is boring. It is not a good thing at all.
Over the years, discussing LotR book and film from all these different perspectives has taught me a lot about both. I've been in online discussions where everyone agrees, and it is boring. It is not a good thing at all.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
I'd assumed it was out of literary snobbery, but I would certainly then have expected him to dismiss the films as well.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
Maybe for me it's both ...WampusCat wrote:I don't read "Lord of the Rings" to be entertained. I read it to live in Middle-Earth.
That's the difference, at least for me.
LotR is much deeper than mere entertainment, certainly.
But it did keep me reading until the early hours, that first time! I found the story thrilling and involving.
As for HP, it can't compare with the richness of Arda. But the Potter books do have a strong, driving narrative and I like that sort of fiction.
"Frodo undertook his quest out of love - to save the world he knew from disaster at his own expense, if he could ... "
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
Letter no. 246, The Collected Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
Avatar by goldlighticons on Live Journal
And now I've been told time and again that movies and books are different media and you can't compare themFrelga wrote:Count Rushdie into the Jackson worshipper clan.
From Rushdie speech on book adaptation. No link, they are a pain on Treo, and Google works.“I would suggest that Peter Jackson’s films were better than Tolkien’s books,” Rushdie said of the “Lord of the Rings” series. “Jackson directs better than Tolkien writes.”
I strongly disagree. There're some beautiful passages in The Hobbit, LOTR and even Silmarillion. Besides, what does he mean? That we enjoy the story, character and the world in spite of the writing? I hate this modern tendency to separate style from content.solicitr wrote:Mind you, Rusdie has been a Tolkien basher from way back. "Nobody reads Tolkien for the writing."