Suspected shooter Elliott Rodger left a 140-page manifesto and several rambling YouTube videos, where he stated that his motivation for the shooting was anger over not being found attractive by women. It seems that he was active in the Men’s Rights movement online, and posted at a forum called PUAHate (PUA being an acronym for Pick-Up Artist – the site is centred around men who are strongly hostile to the seduction community). From Forbes in an article on Rodger’s ‘disturbing internet footprint’:
Commentators who have delved into the question of motivation have raised several issues – Rodger’s mental illness and obvious instability, what impact (if any) his wealth and privilege had on how he was handled by his family and police or on his motives, or whether his postings can be dismissed as the rantings of a madman or whether they indicate a coherent ideology of misogynistic violence. The latter is the approach taken a by a number of left-wing commentators, for example, in DailyKos and The Guardian. The latter article seems to suggest that the Men’s Rights ideology was as much the driving force behind the shooting as, for example, Islamic extremism in Islamic terrorism:Rather than the bodybuilding and anti-PUA communities simply supporting his world views, many challenged them in the conversations I reviewed, all of which have removed from those forums but are available in cached form. “If you could release a virus that would kill every single man on Earth, except for yourself because you would have the antidote, would you do it?,” he asked in an April 2013 thread on Puahate.com. “If you were ugly, you’d still be incel,” responded one forum user referring to the group’s term for “involuntary celibate.” “Women would just have kids by using sperm banks.” Another said he’d destroy the virus and get women by being the hero. Yes, there are ugly attitudes toward women, with one person saying they’d be too stupid to realize they could break into the sperm banks, but it’s not the majority.
On a forum on BodyBuilding.com, users were even more confrontational. When Rodger complained this month about seeing a “short, ugly Indian guy driving a Honda civic [with] a hot blonde girl in his passenger seat,” other users responded to say that he was racist, that his jealously was ugly and that the secret to getting girls was to “be fun to be around” not to have money and a BMW. A user who went by the handle dtugg was especially critical of Rodger. He had apparently seen Rodger’s YouTube videos. “I see you got rid of those serial killer-esc videos on Youtube,” he wrote. Rodger responded saying his parents made him take them down, but that he planned to repost them. “I’m not trying to be mean, but the creepy vibe that you give off in those videos is likely the major reason that you can’t get girls,” responded dtugg.
I have to admit that I initially wondered about the possibility of ‘incel violence’ as opposed to misogynistic violence. When I first read about Rodger my mind jumped quickly to Christine Chubbuck, the Florida newsreader who committed suicide live on television in protest about not having had a boyfriend by age 29. Chubbuck, however, didn’t feel the need to take anyone else with her, and I haven’t anyone else make the connection. And of course, most incels do not seem to turn violent towards themselves or others.Yet, as the artist Molly Crabapple pointed out on Twitter: "White terrorism is always blamed on guns, mental health – never poisonous ideology."
If we need to talk about this tragic shooting in terms of illness, though, let's start with talking about our cultural sickness – a sickness that refuses to see misogyny as anything other than inevitable.
It was reported on Saturday that Rodger's family had contacted the police about his violent and strange videos "weeks" before the shooting. The family attorney said that police interviewed Rodger and thought he was a "perfectly polite, kind and wonderful human".
I have to wonder how much police dismissed Rodger's video rants because of the expectation that violent misogyny in young men is normal and expected.
"Dismissing violent misogynists as 'crazy' is a neat way of saying that violent misogyny is an individual problem, not a cultural one," feminist blogger Melissa McEwan tweeted.
The truth is that there is no such thing as a lone misogynist – they are created by our culture, and by communities that tells them that their hatred is both commonplace and justified.
In one of his final videos, Rodger stated that he was going to prove himself to be the alpha male, and take revenge on the people (both men and women) who made him suffer. In a previous video, he complained that he kept seeing happy young couples around campus, and that they spoiled his view of the nice scenery and drove him into a rage of jealousy. The degree to which his anger was directed at men in relationships as well as women is, in my view, a stumbling-block for the misogynistic violence narrative. But not necessarily a huge one.
A self-aggrandizing ‘lone nut’, a genuinely deeply mentally ill man who was tragically not identified and treated, or a terrorist committed to the cause of a violent and hateful ideology? I fear that this incident of violence will not be the last of its type.