"Children of Húrin" has been published...
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
That's a great review, TORN, written by someone who obviously "gets" Tolkien. Thanks!
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46573
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:34 pm
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46573
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:34 pm
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46573
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
I'll look forward to hearing your impressions.
I've seen a number of references in articles that I have read to the Sil as the "Sell-mirillion" implying that it was produced simply to cash in on Tolkien's popularity. I suspect that you'll get some kind of comment like that. And/or a comment about the "juvenile" nature of the work, with its dragon and talking sword.
I've seen a number of references in articles that I have read to the Sil as the "Sell-mirillion" implying that it was produced simply to cash in on Tolkien's popularity. I suspect that you'll get some kind of comment like that. And/or a comment about the "juvenile" nature of the work, with its dragon and talking sword.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
-
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:34 pm
The news item was a little disjointed. First we saw some ofTheodred's funeral from the movie. Then the reporter, Nazir Iqbal, said that 150 million copies of LOTR had been sold. Then about 15 seconds of Tolkien in 1968 talking about the critics' dislike of narrative devices such as asides to an audience. He made a brief mention of his essay 'On Fairy-Tales' I would guess he was referring to reaction to The Hobbit.
Then we had an interview with Adam Tolkien saying that the elements of the new book could be found in scholarly works (HOME of course) but this book provided a stand-alone story. He mentioned the incest but said it was a minor matter among the dark tragic events of death and betrayal. He tried a little lamely to place the action in relation to the events of LOTR; an unenviable task in the time he had available. He pointed out that nonetheless the story was a beautiful one. Then we switched to the Alan Lee exhibition and Nazir Iqbal interviewed him in the gallery. We saw some of his illustrations, several being from LOTR such as the fellowship by the Doors of Durin and the breaking of the wall at Helm's Deep, as well as Húrin seated on Thangorodrim. Lee compared book illustrations that are next to the words themselves to a film. At one point we had a few more seconds of Tolkien trying to put LOTR into context with his world of the Silmarillion. Yes, seconds. Interestingly he referred to (probably) Sauron as the devil, though he might have meant Morgoth. We also had a brief clip of Aragorn in the Rohan stables and the purist (they didn't use that word I believe) objections to such passages in the film were compared to the unhobbit-like nature of the new book.
Sorry it was a bit garbled but I couldn't video it so have relied on memory.
It was good to see the prof but his diction wasn't very clear. I think it was perhaps a reaction to excitement or stress and probably led to these brief snippets resting in the vaults until now.
Then we had an interview with Adam Tolkien saying that the elements of the new book could be found in scholarly works (HOME of course) but this book provided a stand-alone story. He mentioned the incest but said it was a minor matter among the dark tragic events of death and betrayal. He tried a little lamely to place the action in relation to the events of LOTR; an unenviable task in the time he had available. He pointed out that nonetheless the story was a beautiful one. Then we switched to the Alan Lee exhibition and Nazir Iqbal interviewed him in the gallery. We saw some of his illustrations, several being from LOTR such as the fellowship by the Doors of Durin and the breaking of the wall at Helm's Deep, as well as Húrin seated on Thangorodrim. Lee compared book illustrations that are next to the words themselves to a film. At one point we had a few more seconds of Tolkien trying to put LOTR into context with his world of the Silmarillion. Yes, seconds. Interestingly he referred to (probably) Sauron as the devil, though he might have meant Morgoth. We also had a brief clip of Aragorn in the Rohan stables and the purist (they didn't use that word I believe) objections to such passages in the film were compared to the unhobbit-like nature of the new book.
Sorry it was a bit garbled but I couldn't video it so have relied on memory.
It was good to see the prof but his diction wasn't very clear. I think it was perhaps a reaction to excitement or stress and probably led to these brief snippets resting in the vaults until now.
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46573
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Thanks, Tosh!
Here is a really good review at Salon.com:
http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2007/04/17/Húrin/
Here is a really good review at Salon.com:
http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2007/04/17/Húrin/
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
Tosh, I watched it also. A few things that stood out for me. Firstly, the references Tolkien made about critics not liking the "asides" in fairy stories. I thought he said that his first critics were his children and that they were the ones who disliked the fairy tale conventions of dropping out of the story to refer directly to the audience. As you say though, his speech was quite indistinct. I would have agreed though that he was referring to Morgoth as the Devil, not Sauron.
I thought Adam Tolkien did an admirable job of selling the book on its own merits without trying to pretend its something its not. He made it clear that most of this was already published, and that this was only different in its attempt to present a complete uninterrupted narrative.
This was no "review" of the book as such, merely a news item on its publication.
Oh, and Alan Lee's artwork looks even more stunning whe its full size on a gallery wall...
I thought Adam Tolkien did an admirable job of selling the book on its own merits without trying to pretend its something its not. He made it clear that most of this was already published, and that this was only different in its attempt to present a complete uninterrupted narrative.
This was no "review" of the book as such, merely a news item on its publication.
Oh, and Alan Lee's artwork looks even more stunning whe its full size on a gallery wall...
The Vinyamars on Stage! This time at Bag End
- truehobbit
- Cute, cuddly and dangerous to know
- Posts: 6019
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 2:52 am
- Contact:
- Rowanberry
- Bregalad's Lost Entwife
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 10:15 pm
- Location: Rooted in the northern woods
- Contact:
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46573
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
scirocco, I don't think you sound lukewarm in your review, just honest. As I said there, it sounds very much as I expected. Really, this is not so much a work for those of us that have studied Tolkien's work obsessively. It is more to make an important part of Tolkien's work more accessible to a wider audience. I thought your review did a good job of focusing on how successful it is likely to be in doing that. The prove will be in the pudding, however (meaning, of course, whether that wider audience appreciates the work, or is put off by some of the daunting things that you mention in your review).
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46573
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
I have it here in my greedy little hands. They only had the regular edition, which is fine because I ordered the deluxe edition from Amazon. I'll probably just read this one and then give it to someone who I think will appreciate it but might not buy it themself.
I also heard a good interview with Michael Drout (editor of the new Tolkien encyclopaedia) on the public radio program "Here and Now".
I also heard a good interview with Michael Drout (editor of the new Tolkien encyclopaedia) on the public radio program "Here and Now".
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
fyi -- getting very positive reviews in popular press -- on CNN (which posted an AP story that is being picked up everywhere and in Time magazine (or at least the website) --
http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/books/0 ... olkien.ap/
http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0 ... 48,00.html- with a pic of a young JRRT
http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/books/0 ... olkien.ap/
http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0 ... 48,00.html- with a pic of a young JRRT
- BrianIsSmilingAtYou
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:01 am
- Location: Philadelphia
I see that Mithluin (along with Michael Drout, Mike Perry and Verlyn Flieger among others) had a comment on the timeonline review. Go Mith! Give 'em heck!
Brianis AtYouPeople who could not finish reading Lord of the Rings because they found it to lack depth should realize that writing reviews of Tolkien's works just makes them look foolish. I understand the attempt to 'distance' this new book from Tolkein's other stories to appeal to a new audience, but disparaging the original audience is rather disingenuous. Tolkien most certainly did 'update' his stories. He did not give them modern settings nor did he tell them in a modern style....but he infused the characters with a dignity and gave their lives a meaning that is sorely lacking in (for instance) the Tale of Kullervo that serves as the model for Túrin and Neinor. I suppose "purged them of the gross" is how he put it.
MithLuin, Baltimore, MD,
All of my nieces and nephews at my godson/nephew Nicholas's Medical School graduation. Now a neurosurgical resident at University of Arizona, Tucson.
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
Where was that, Brian? I went to the Time article, but couldn't find any link to comments.
I dislike the Time review. It reminds me of the bad old days when the films were coming out—well, that part was okay , but all the writing about Tolkien from people who were Too Cool to Care really stung sometimes.
I dislike the Time review. It reminds me of the bad old days when the films were coming out—well, that part was okay , but all the writing about Tolkien from people who were Too Cool to Care really stung sometimes.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King