Aravar wrote:
I think part of the problem is cultural. In Britain it's not obscure to have run being R. If you're not familiar with cricket it will look terribly contrived. In the same way Jn and Mith have shown that 'TA' for thanks is obscure for an American, on the other hand PACT is easy for them. You didn't pick it up, presumably, because US state abbreviations aren't as familiar to you.
No, I think the problem is that no one unfamiliar with cryptic conventions would assume, from reading the word "run" in the clue, that you are meant to use the abbreviation for it as a letter in the solution. Similarly with PA and CT - there was nothing in the clue that told you you needed the abbreviations.
In my clue, while "ta" may be better known to British people, it said "short thanks" - so even without knowing any conventions you could figure out that you needed a short form for "thanks".
That's what makes the difference for me between a puzzle that is fun and one that's contrived.
Is CHARGER your warhorse one, charger being a warhorse and charges being used in artillery?
Nope. But that's part of it. It wouldn't be funny if it were "charger" because that would simply fit the definition of 'war horse'. Like I said, it's usually
compound nouns, because they are more easily misinterpreted.
Btw, I just spoke to a new colleague of mine on the phone who sounds exactly like you, Aravar!

That is, the accent is a little different, but the melody and rhythm of the language is the same - I've never seen him, so I get quite confused when I listen to him, somehow picturing you at the other end.
