The Desolation of Smaug anticipation thread [SPOILERS]

For discussion of the upcoming films based on The Hobbit and related material, as well as previous films based on Tolkien's work
Post Reply
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
Aurë entuluva! Day shall come again!
Posts: 49557
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

axordil wrote:Ah, right. I forgot about the exceptional nature of Fëanor's remarriage.
On the other hand, I supposed that it is possible that an Avari Elf would have less pure ideas, and that that is why Jackson said "yes" to Colbert's question.
kzer_za wrote:Well, while none would be best, I just feel like an unrequited crush would probably change the story less than an actual romance.
It could still be just an requited crush on Legolas just as much as on Thranduil, though. However ....
Elen wrote:But didn't Jackson also categorically say that there would be no romance between Tauriel and Legolas, after the Itaril character and her description was thrown out?
He did, didn't he? Of course, it is possible that it changed, but I doubt it.

As for Hambleton's comment about a young Gimli, I would say he is alluding to the portrait Gloin carries of his wife and son, Gimli, as a "boy" which we've already seen in the teaser.
Yes, I saw that some TORN poster called "Eleniel" said this and I agreed with it (silently) then. I still agree.
posters on TORn seem to have taken RA's comments about looking forward to "coming face-to-face with Cumberbatch" to mean that somehow Thorin will be having a face-off with Smaug!!!

I really don't see it myself...but should Jackson feel a need to do this to somehow justify his reimagining of Thorin's character because having the Dwarves hiding behind Bilbo would be "too cowardly" then I will wash my hands of the whole project!
I did wonder about that too when I watched the clip. It was not clear to me what Richard meant. I would not be suprised if there was some change to the whole sequence. It does seem unlikely that Thorin as presented by Jackson and friends would send Bilbo down the tunnel himself. But I will wait until I see exactly how it plays out before deciding whether to wash my hands of the whole project!

If the filmmakers could decide to have Aragorn have a face-off with Sauron, they certainly could decide to have Thorin have a face-off with Smaug. They came to their sense about the former, so hopefully they will do so with regard to the latter.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Alatar
of Vinyamar
Posts: 10949
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Post by Alatar »

I can't see him sending Thorin down the Tunnel with Bilbo, but I wonder if he would have Thorin stay outside the tunnel until the last possible moment before Smaug destroys the exit? That would allow for a confrontation of sorts.
Image
The Vinyamars on Stage! This time at Bag End
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
Aurë entuluva! Day shall come again!
Posts: 49557
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

That sounds about right to me.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Elentári
Posts: 5199
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:03 pm
Location: Green Hill Country

Post by Elentári »

Cool video from MordorCast investigating "The High Fells of Rhudaur in terms of canonicity and movie invention!

http://www.thelandofshadow.com/mordorca ... f-rhudaur/
There is magic in long-distance friendships. They let you relate to other human beings in a way that goes beyond being physically together and is often more profound.
~Diana Cortes
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
Aurë entuluva! Day shall come again!
Posts: 49557
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Very interesting. I've not come across that site before.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
Aurë entuluva! Day shall come again!
Posts: 49557
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

A clip of some of the cast discussing the second film. The most interesting part as at the beginning when RA talks about the evolving relationship between Thorin and Bilbo.

http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/interv ... video.html
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Elentári
Posts: 5199
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:03 pm
Location: Green Hill Country

Post by Elentári »

Voronwë the Faithful wrote:A clip of some of the cast discussing the second film. The most interesting part as at the beginning when RA talks about the evolving relationship between Thorin and Bilbo.
Hmm..."very firm friendship" which in film becomes "so tight" before it blows apart??
There is magic in long-distance friendships. They let you relate to other human beings in a way that goes beyond being physically together and is often more profound.
~Diana Cortes
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
Aurë entuluva! Day shall come again!
Posts: 49557
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Some odd poster at TORN posted this and thought it was worth sharing:

Image
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
Primula Baggins
Living in hope
Posts: 40005
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
Contact:

Post by Primula Baggins »

No one could possibly be that odd.

Still, it's an imposing look for Smaug. I assume he's going to fly in a harness over a model of Laketown.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
User avatar
Elentári
Posts: 5199
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:03 pm
Location: Green Hill Country

Post by Elentári »

Obviously the "odd" poster didn't think it worth giving HoF such an exclusive scoop... :roll:


Still, here are further cast interviews on What to expect from The Desolation Of Smaug
English-born Armitage, who played the self-proclaimed leader of the dwarfs, Thorin, also teased how his character’s relationship with Bilbo, played by a curly haired Martin Freeman, will not only become key to the story, but also to understanding his own character. “He learns about himself through Bilbo”, said Armitage. “We’re going to see that progress into movie two, where it evolves, and is then destroyed in movie three [‘The Hobbit: There and Back Again’].

“The relationship was always arching in a certain direction, creating a dramatic conclusion to movie one,” he added. “We’re driving to destination, when Thorin picks up Bilbo and is very, very violent towards him at the end of Tolkien’s story, in the book.

“I’m not giving anything away. You have to get to that place somehow...”
There is magic in long-distance friendships. They let you relate to other human beings in a way that goes beyond being physically together and is often more profound.
~Diana Cortes
User avatar
Elentári
Posts: 5199
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:03 pm
Location: Green Hill Country

Post by Elentári »

James Nesbitt interview on DenofGeek
I’m really excited about two actually, because I think that now we’re up and running that part two is a lot more about the dwarves and the hobbit and the wizard.
That's what he thinks...he obviously hasn't heard about PJ's plans for Azog - or, for that matter, Bard's backstory and Tauriel's expanded role! ;)
There is magic in long-distance friendships. They let you relate to other human beings in a way that goes beyond being physically together and is often more profound.
~Diana Cortes
User avatar
sinister71
Posts: 127
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:42 pm
Location: South Carolina

Post by sinister71 »

Voronwë the Faithful wrote: Not to mention a couple of scenes that are among the best ever filmed evah.

In my humble opinion.
I would argee to a certain extent... I think the first 45 minutes of the film even with its minor changes was spot on, almost perfect. Once they left Baggend though it was all down hill. I did enjoy the betting scene and the talk about the 5 wizards, and other than schizophrenic Gollum Riddles in the dark was alright nont great but not horrible either. Most of the rest of the film was just OTT and unnecessary.

Stone Giants would have been better if they were merely in the background with boulders flying close to the dwarfs. with rain and thunder just to get the dwarfs thinking about finding shelter. Not riding upon it like it were some ride at Six Flags amusement park that was just overkill and ruined them for me.

Goblin Town I just got so tired of the whole Indiana Jones vibe, the swooping camera shots designed to show off the 3D and new frame rate.

Azog I just hated the WHOLE Azog plot/story line. I prefer what Tolkien wrote. The history of the dwarf / Goblin war was brilliant and more dramatic than the worthless stuff that Peter Jackson wrote trying to out do Tolkien. They should have had Dain, Azog being beheaded, and if they really felt they needed someone chasing Thorin around middle earth use Bolg since THAT would have at least stuck somewhat to Tolkien's work.

The film was at best ok maybe I just had my expectations too high. I know better for the next one
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
Aurë entuluva! Day shall come again!
Posts: 49557
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Hey Sinister! Nice to see you here!
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
sinister71
Posts: 127
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:42 pm
Location: South Carolina

Post by sinister71 »

Voronwë the Faithful wrote:Hey Sinister! Nice to see you here!
Thanks... getting frustrated at the usual places, getting tired of being warned about getting banned for stating things that are generalizations about human nature and people getting their panties in a twist over it
and being a mod in another place gets tiresome keeping the spam at bay so its kind of nice to just post somewhere that I only have to worry about posting my opinion and not moderate others from getting out of hand
User avatar
Elentári
Posts: 5199
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:03 pm
Location: Green Hill Country

Post by Elentári »

Hi Sinister! Happy to see you here also :) - and since you know me as Eleniel at that other place, I hardly need confirm that we're pretty much in agreement on how AUJ turned out...

For me the frustrating thing is how so much of it Jackson got right - let's face it he had the perfect ingredients and resources to work with - yet he managed to make an Eton mess out of a Pavlova!
There is magic in long-distance friendships. They let you relate to other human beings in a way that goes beyond being physically together and is often more profound.
~Diana Cortes
User avatar
sinister71
Posts: 127
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:42 pm
Location: South Carolina

Post by sinister71 »

completely agree. most of the elements were there. I think most of it in all honesty was just OTT and unbelievable compared to LOTR. There are scenes I really felt would be much better.

One I think would have been just as entertaining as what Jackson gave us is the end of the Baggend part. Here is how I would have done that scene...

The dwarfs should have taken the contract with them, since Balin and Thorin agreed the night before, they had lost their burgler. Then after Bilbo awakes, thinks everything is over, Gandalf shows up and rushes him out the door. No back pack, no waving a 38 foot contract behind him, no announcing to Hobbiton that he is going on an adventure. Then when Bilbo catches up they re-give him the contract and he signs it there. On to the betting scene and heck even leave in the pocket handkerchief scene with Bofur. With maybe a scene where Dwalin or maybe Dori gives Bilbo their spare traveling cloak. Then we could at least see the great visual Tolkien gave us of Bilbo wearing a hood and cloak too large for him in the soaking rain... At least THAT would have been more like the book.

The trolls went from a situation Bilbo was scared and nervous during being unsure of himself to a scene where Bilbo takes charge and distracts the trolls till the light of dawn which presumably he knew nothing about.

The Stone giants well I liked seeing them but once the dwarfs started riding them like a six flags ride it was so awful i went to the rest room just to get out of the theater for a minute. I think had they kept the stone giants in the background with boulders being hurled towards the dwarfs during the thunder storm it would have worked much better.

Them getting to Rivendell could have done with out the secret tunnel and being forced that way by orcs. Purely a pointless change that failed IMO since Radagast kept leading the orcs closer to the dwarfs than he was away from them. I think Radagast had potential, but it was squandered by making him an idiot dope addict who was covered in bird crap.

I hated the whole underground moon rune table thing, I would have preferred to see something along the lines of the Rankiin and Bass version where he merely walks to a window facing the moon and they show in the light of the moon. Instead of having some crappy table that reflects the moons light.

Then we have Goblin Town while I really liked some of it I hated the large swooping camera shot all the time. Was this Indiana Jones or a middle earth film? Did we really need to see how big the realm of the Goblins was constantly? I would have preferred more close up character moments. Instead of what we got with the far away shots to show off the 3D and virtual world of CGI with all the constant falling and tumbling without a single injury. i thought Barry Humphreys did a great job as the Great Goblin though just the right amount of mocking attitude with a certain amount of thinking himself high and mighty above the dwarfs.

Riddles in the dark was fairly good but should have been darker not visually darker but tone wise darker. Jackson played up the humor and schizophrenic personality disorder way too much. for no other reason than "THAT is what people expect" to almost quote P Boyens. That and they overplayed the ring and its importance at this time in the story. The ring should have been nothing more than a trinket that was not put in the limelight. The whole slow motion portrayal gives too much away, seeing Bilbo watch Gollum lose the ring and then almost immediately pick it up, goes against the way Tolkien described it. As Bilbo finding it in the dark without knowing it was there. Makes Bilbo seem like a thief in Jackson's version since he knew who's it was but took it anyways. I preferred Jackson's own finding of the ring from FOTR to the hobbit version.

Then we have the whole out of the frying pan sequence which should have been great but it looked so darn phony. And where where the multi-colored flaming pinecones Gandalf began throwing? plain ol' fire thats all we got. Not to mention all the Azog garbage during that scene, Bilbo killing wargs, standing off against Azog.... What a load of nonsense.

I think had they stuck closer to Tolkien's book and worried less about wanting to change the whole thing into something its not. The film might have turned out SOOOOOOO much better than it did. But all this is just personal opinion :D
User avatar
Elentári
Posts: 5199
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:03 pm
Location: Green Hill Country

Post by Elentári »

sinister71 wrote:One I think would have been just as entertaining as what Jackson gave us is the end of the Baggend part. Here is how I would have done that scene...

The dwarfs should have taken the contract with them, since Balin and Thorin agreed the night before, they had lost their burgler. Then after Bilbo awakes, thinks everything is over, Gandalf shows up and rushes him out the door. No back pack, no waving a 38 foot contract behind him, no announcing to Hobbiton that he is going on an adventure. Then when Bilbo catches up they re-give him the contract and he signs it there. On to the betting scene and heck even leave in the pocket handkerchief scene with Bofur. With maybe a scene where Dwalin or maybe Dori gives Bilbo their spare traveling cloak. Then we could at least see the great visual Tolkien gave us of Bilbo wearing a hood and cloak too large for him in the soaking rain... At least THAT would have been more like the book.
Overall I liked Jackson's version of "the morning after", since it worked very well, and is a good example of where a Director can put a different take on the story whilst still in keeping with the spirit and basics of the tale. I would have liked to have seen Bilbo catch up with the party at the Green Dragon, though...
The trolls went from a situation Bilbo was scared and nervous during being unsure of himself to a scene where Bilbo takes charge and distracts the trolls till the light of dawn which presumably he knew nothing about.
Totally agreed. The sequence was robbed of all tension and simply played for laughs. I appreciate that possibly the original ventriloquism idea might not have come off well on screen, but taking out Gandalf's role in the rescue in order to "develop" Bilbo's character arc took away any suspense or sense of danger. The need to inform Bilbo that the Trolls would turn to stone if still out after Dawn, meant that the audience also knew straight away what was going to happen. And the ridiculous parasite dialogue... :roll: For me, watching AUJ the first time, that is where the alarm bells started to go off...
The Stone giants well I liked seeing them but once the dwarfs started riding them like a six flags ride it was so awful i went to the rest room just to get out of the theater for a minute. I think had they kept the stone giants in the background with boulders being hurled towards the dwarfs during the thunder storm it would have worked much better.

Word. I know people keep comparing it to the falling stairs in FotR but IMO that never came close to the levels of incredulity the SG theme park ride gave us. At least with the Moria staircase you could believe it possible for the characters to make that jump.
Them getting to Rivendell could have done with out the secret tunnel and being forced that way by orcs. Purely a pointless change that failed IMO since Radagast kept leading the orcs closer to the dwarfs than he was away from them. I think Radagast had potential, but it was squandered by making him an idiot dope addict who was covered in bird crap.
The hidden crevasse business kinda made sense the more times I watched it, particularly when I saw someone post a quote from the book that did indeed back up PJ's interpretation...

"They came on unexpected valleys, narrow with steep sides, that opened suddenly at their feet, and they looked down surprised to see trees below them and running water at the bottom. There were gullies they could almost leap over, but very deep with waterfalls in them."

...but the whole Radagast bunny sled/Warg chase was totally pointless.
I hated the whole underground moon rune table thing, I would have preferred to see something along the lines of the Rankiin and Bass version where he merely walks to a window facing the moon and they show in the light of the moon. Instead of having some crappy table that reflects the moons light.
I had no problem with this really, since I love the design of Rivendell and it was great to see a new part. Yes, it was probably unnecessary, but aesthetically it was beautiful! The worst part was probably the scriptwriting which had Balin going from one minute telling Thorin not to give Elrond the map, to the next eagerly spilling the beans about how they would have to hurry to get to Erebor in time for when the secret door is visible!
Then we have Goblin Town while I really liked some of it I hated the large swooping camera shot all the time. Was this Indiana Jones or a middle earth film? Did we really need to see how big the realm of the Goblins was constantly? I would have preferred more close up character moments. Instead of what we got with the far away shots to show off the 3D and virtual world of CGI with all the constant falling and tumbling without a single injury. i thought Barry Humphreys did a great job as the Great Goblin though just the right amount of mocking attitude with a certain amount of thinking himself high and mighty above the dwarfs.
Yep, agreed about the Indiana Jones feel. Actually, I think it was worse with 3D, and perhaps the HFR, because watching in on the Blu-Ray at home it does work better For some reason people get riled when the "videogame" analogy is used, but in this case, it is almost as if the whole location was design with the inevitable spin off videogame firmly in mind
Riddles in the dark was fairly good but should have been darker not visually darker but tone wise darker. Jackson played up the humor and schizophrenic personality disorder way too much. for no other reason than "THAT is what people expect" to almost quote P Boyens. That and they overplayed the ring and its importance at this time in the story. The ring should have been nothing more than a trinket that was not put in the limelight. The whole slow motion portrayal gives too much away, seeing Bilbo watch Gollum lose the ring and then almost immediately pick it up, goes against the way Tolkien described it. As Bilbo finding it in the dark without knowing it was there. Makes Bilbo seem like a thief in Jackson's version since he knew who's it was but took it anyways. I preferred Jackson's own finding of the ring from FOTR to the hobbit version.
The Sméagol/Gollum split p. doesn't both me, but agree completely about the slow mo business with the Ring. We didn't need to see Gollum lose it like that. As you say, the FotR version is superior. but it's just another example of PJ feeling he has to spell everything out for the general audience. Surely we should be given some credit to be able to put 2 and 2 together if Bilbo finds a ring and then Gollum starts shouting that he's lost something precious???
Then we have the whole out of the frying pan sequence which should have been great but it looked so darn phony. And where where the multi-colored flaming pinecones Gandalf began throwing? plain ol' fire thats all we got. Not to mention all the Azog garbage during that scene, Bilbo killing wargs, standing off against Azog.... What a load of nonsense.

I think had they stuck closer to Tolkien's book and worried less about wanting to change the whole thing into something its not. The film might have turned out SOOOOOOO much better than it did. But all this is just personal opinion :D
What is so frustrating is that it sounds like the 'frying pan' scene they filmed originally was so much closer to the book version, before they added in Azog the Idiot. What a crying shame...I do feel a tighter, 2-film version would have given us a better adaptation than this padded, fan-fic filled, rather hit and miss 3-film version.
There is magic in long-distance friendships. They let you relate to other human beings in a way that goes beyond being physically together and is often more profound.
~Diana Cortes
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
Aurë entuluva! Day shall come again!
Posts: 49557
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

Elentári wrote:What is so frustrating is that it sounds like the 'frying pan' scene they filmed originally was so much closer to the book version, before they added in Azog the Idiot. What a crying shame...I do feel a tighter, 2-film version would have given us a better adaptation than this padded, fan-fic filled, rather hit and miss 3-film version.
I was cautiously supportive of the shift to 3 films on the theory that Jackson was always going to include a lot of Jacksonion extraneous stuff, and that with 3 films at least we would be likely to get more good Tolkienian material. And that may well still prove to the be case when all is said and done. But the fact of the matter is that the only change that we know of for sure that was generated by the shift to three films was adding in the whole Azog the Idioty idiocy. As such, I am forced to agree with you that it would have been better if they had stuck with 2 films.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
User avatar
sinister71
Posts: 127
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:42 pm
Location: South Carolina

Post by sinister71 »

I still say and will always say that the 3 film decision was not Jackson's. I believe they put a political spin on the choice of going from 2 to 3 films and it was easier for the public to swallow coming from Peter Jackson. Had it been the studio saying "now we are making 3 films instead of 2" people would see the rouse for what it is, all about money. WB saw an opportunity to make a 3rd film with little capital to make but would mean huge revenue for them in the long run. There is no other way to explain it. Azog IMO was a complete failure esp when making a film supposedly based on Tolkien's works.

Having worked for a company owned by WB, I'm pretty certain the 3 film idea was theirs, they just had Peter Jackson saying he had more story to tell to appease the Tolkien fans and those anticipating the Hobbit films. Only Jackson and WB know the truth and I'm sure the fans will never hear what went on behind closed doors about the decision to split the film into a trilogy instead of just 2 films. And the powers that be will keep using the whole positive PR machine to make it shown in a good light. Instead of telling people they are being milked out of their hard earned money unnecessarily.

Long story long I agree 2 films would have been enough to tell the story of the Hobbit in very rich detail as well as including the whole necromancer/ DolGuldur subplot. I think it would have matched the book even better and been a better set of films.
User avatar
Voronwë the Faithful
Aurë entuluva! Day shall come again!
Posts: 49557
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Contact:

Post by Voronwë the Faithful »

"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
Post Reply