CIA Director General David Petraeus' resignation
CIA Director General David Petraeus' resignation
[Note: I split this off from the "President Obama: What's Next?" thread - VtF]
Whoa. Petraeus resigns as CIA Director. He says it's because he had an extra-marital affair.
Whoa. Petraeus resigns as CIA Director. He says it's because he had an extra-marital affair.
When you can do nothing what can you do?
Well, the right thing, IMO, would have been not having an affair. Certainly a man in his position is expected to exercise sufficient judgment and self control.
Eta: NYT is saying that this came to light when FBI was checking his computer to see if it was compromised. The head of the CIA could not have been that clueless, could he?
Eta: NYT is saying that this came to light when FBI was checking his computer to see if it was compromised. The head of the CIA could not have been that clueless, could he?
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- Primula Baggins
- Living in hope
- Posts: 40005
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:43 am
- Location: Sailing the luminiferous aether
- Contact:
He couldn't have been. He knew he was doing something that disqualified him for a security clearance.
“There, peeping among the cloud-wrack above a dark tor high up in the mountains, Sam saw a white star twinkle for a while. The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
Well goodness, I thought that aspect was clear without being specifically stated. Of course not having an affair was the right thing to do for a million reasons, and he was mistaken and displayed poor judgment and a lack of character for partaking in such a thing. I think that was clear from the start.Frelga wrote:Well, the right thing, IMO, would have been not having an affair. Certainly a man in his position is expected to exercise sufficient judgment and self control.
Eta: NYT is saying that this came to light when FBI was checking his computer to see if it was compromised. The head of the CIA could not have been that clueless, could he?
What was refreshing and different, was that he admitted his guilt without the long drawn out hoopla of denials and media frenzy that haunted any number of people from the recent past.
What he did was wrong, but how he dealt with the situation was correctly done. Whether that was a decision made by the Obama administration or himself personally, is circumspect. Whether this was put on the back burner until after the election is also circumspect.
A bad situation was handled correctly for a change, and that was the aspect of this sad story that I found encouraging..
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46359
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Um, Holby, the affair was revealed in the midst of an as yet unidentified FBI investigation. It's not like he just admitted it out of the goodness of his heart. The fact that the FBI was investigating the head of the CIA (and former commander in both Iraq and Afghanistan) is more than a little disturbing.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Túrin Turambar
- Posts: 6157
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 9:37 am
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
If I was in a snide mood, I might post a picture of Holly Petraeus next to Paula Broadwell and suggest that the General's judgement is perfectly sound, but I'm not, so I won't .
I'll just echo Dave's comment and say that the entire thing seems weird and sudden and I have to think that there's more to it than this. I understand that the affair dates from when Ms. Broadwell was embedded (snark) with Petraeus in Afghanistan in order to work on his biography, so it presumably pre-dates his involvement with the CIA.
I'll just echo Dave's comment and say that the entire thing seems weird and sudden and I have to think that there's more to it than this. I understand that the affair dates from when Ms. Broadwell was embedded (snark) with Petraeus in Afghanistan in order to work on his biography, so it presumably pre-dates his involvement with the CIA.
Ummm... Bill Clinton. John Edwards. Many others that I probably have blocked out at this moment. A man in their position really really SHOULD exercise sufficient judgment and self control. Many don't.Holbytla wrote:Well goodness, I thought that aspect was clear without being specifically stated. Of course not having an affair was the right thing to do for a million reasons, and he was mistaken and displayed poor judgment and a lack of character for partaking in such a thing. I think that was clear from the start.Frelga wrote:Well, the right thing, IMO, would have been not having an affair. Certainly a man in his position is expected to exercise sufficient judgment and self control.
Is Petraeus a Republican, btw, or associated with Republican values in some way?
I kind of wondered why this was such a big deal too, Alatar. I'm not a big fan of infidelity in general, but does it really affect his ability to do his job?
Can I infer from this that Holly Petraeus is not as attractive as Paula Broadwell??Lord M wrote:If I was in a snide mood, I might post a picture of Holly Petraeus next to Paula Broadwell and suggest that the General's judgement is perfectly sound, but I'm not, so I won't .
If I were in a less forgiving mood, this comment might truly not sit well with me, Lord M.
Last edited by anthriel on Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"What do you fear, lady?" Aragorn asked.
"A cage," Éowyn said. "To stay behind bars, until use and old age accept them, and all chance of doing great deeds is gone beyond recall or desire.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
"A cage," Éowyn said. "To stay behind bars, until use and old age accept them, and all chance of doing great deeds is gone beyond recall or desire.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
- axordil
- Pleasantly Twisted
- Posts: 8999
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:35 pm
- Location: Black Creek Bottoms
- Contact:
Petraeus had been mentioned by many as a GOP hopeful, though I always detected hopefulness in those mentions. He may be Republican, but he struck me as somewhat less political than Eishenhower, who's my gold standard for non-political politicians.
Ike fooled around too, for what it's worth, during WW II. Being a commander of armies in times of war does things to otherwise strong and decent people...then again, war isn't decent.
Ike fooled around too, for what it's worth, during WW II. Being a commander of armies in times of war does things to otherwise strong and decent people...then again, war isn't decent.
You know, now that you mention that, it does sort of ring a bell.axordil wrote:Petraeus had been mentioned by many as a GOP hopeful, though I always detected hopefulness in those mentions. He may be Republican, but he struck me as somewhat less political than Eishenhower, who's my gold standard for non-political politicians.
There is something to that. I am reading a book about WW I, and the descriptions of people's behavior in the streets on Armistice Day are... well, let's just say that primal behaviors were much in effect.Ike fooled around too, for what it's worth, during WW II. Being a commander of armies in times of war does things to otherwise strong and decent people...then again, war isn't decent.
"What do you fear, lady?" Aragorn asked.
"A cage," Éowyn said. "To stay behind bars, until use and old age accept them, and all chance of doing great deeds is gone beyond recall or desire.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
"A cage," Éowyn said. "To stay behind bars, until use and old age accept them, and all chance of doing great deeds is gone beyond recall or desire.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King
He was a Bush's appointee (?) who was at one time considered a possible Republican challenger to Obama in this election we just had. Why did you ask, anthy?
Yeah, yeah, Bill Clinton. It always comes back to Bill Clinton.
I dunno, some people still talk about officer's honor. No one has mentioned a politician's honor in a long time.
Actually, what I find most appalling is his apparent lack of judgment in compromising his computer.
So, is he still going to testify?
Yeah, yeah, Bill Clinton. It always comes back to Bill Clinton.
I dunno, some people still talk about officer's honor. No one has mentioned a politician's honor in a long time.
Actually, what I find most appalling is his apparent lack of judgment in compromising his computer.
So, is he still going to testify?
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46359
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Actually, he was appointed by President Obama to his last two positions, as commander of the forces in Afghanistan, and as CIA Director.Frelga wrote:He was a Bush's appointee (?) who was at one time considered a possible Republican challenger to Obama in this election we just had. Why did you ask, anthy?
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
- Dave_LF
- Wrong within normal parameters
- Posts: 6836
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: The other side of Michigan
To elaborate on my earlier comment, if I were caught sleeping with my biographer, there would be a variety of consequences, but getting fired wouldn't be one of them. And the argument that "a man in his position" needs to show more moral fiber doesn't hold much weight either, given the sorts of activities the CIA routinely engages in (and that's just considering the ones we know about).
- Voronwë the Faithful
- At the intersection of here and now
- Posts: 46359
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
- Contact:
Hey Dave, when is your biography coming out?
Clearly, there is a lot more going on here than has been (or in all likelihood, will be) revealed.
Clearly, there is a lot more going on here than has been (or in all likelihood, will be) revealed.
"Spirits in the shape of hawks and eagles flew ever to and from his halls; and their eyes could see to the depths of the seas, and pierce the hidden caverns beneath the world."
This is what I meant:Voronwë the Faithful wrote:Actually, he was appointed by President Obama to his last two positions, as commander of the forces in Afghanistan, and as CIA Director.Frelga wrote:He was a Bush's appointee (?) who was at one time considered a possible Republican challenger to Obama in this election we just had. Why did you ask, anthy?
Although as far as I know, no one made any connection between Petraeus's having an affair and any party affiliation he had or did not have. Which is why I wondered why anthy asked about Republican values.President George W. Bush sent Petraeus to Iraq in February 2007, at the peak of sectarian violence, to turn things around as head of U.S. forces. He oversaw an influx of 30,000 U.S. troops and moved troops out of big bases so they could work more closely with Iraqi forces scattered throughout Baghdad.
Petraeus' success was credited with paving the way for the eventual U.S. withdrawal.
After Iraq, Bush made Petraeus commander of U.S. Central Command, overseeing all U.S. military operations in the greater Middle East, including Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Source
From the same article:
Talk about "should have known better."The FBI discovered the relationship by monitoring Petraeus' emails, after being alerted Broadwell may have had access to his personal email account, two of the officials said.
And alerted by whom, we wonders.
If there was anything that depressed him more than his own cynicism, it was that quite often it still wasn't as cynical as real life.
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!
- Dave_LF
- Wrong within normal parameters
- Posts: 6836
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:59 am
- Location: The other side of Michigan
I keep checking Amazon, but they seem to be dragging their feet.Voronwë the Faithful wrote:Hey Dave, when is your biography coming out?
Clearly, there is a lot more going on here than has been (or in all likelihood, will be) revealed.
I'm sure there's more to it too, but this seems awkward even as a cover story.